Subscribe to
Posts
Comments
Subscribe with Bloglines

I must have missed the memo about North Carolina becoming a police state. Apparently, the police chief in King, NC, believes that she has the authority to write her own laws and suspend the federal constitution when it suits her. I know that North Carolina has shall issue concealed carry, and I assume that some of the licensees live in King, so some folks civil rights have been severely violated, and for what? A snow storm?

Alcohol Restrictions, Curfew Lifted In King

Police Chief: King Remains Under State Of Emergency Until Monday

KING, N.C. — Authorities lifted a curfew and alcohol restrictions in King on Sunday, but said a state of emergency declaration remained in effect until Monday.

Authorities said the state of emergency declaration would continue until Monday 9 a.m., barring any unforeseen circumstances or severe changes.

Effective Sunday afternoon, alcohol restrictions and a curfew were lifted. All other remaining restrictions would continue until Monday, said Paula May, King police chief.

Other restrictions include a ban on the sale or purchase of any type of firearm, ammunition, explosive or any possession of such items off a person’s own premises.

Also on Sunday, the emergency shelter established by the American red Cross at West Stokes High School was closed.

"We appreciate the support and cooperation of everyone with our efforts to keep the citizens of King safe," May said.

The state of emergency was declared Friday due to severe weather.

Source: WXII12.com.

IRS Buying Shotguns

Nice guns, too. Better make sure you get your taxes paid on time…

 

Solicitation Number:

TIRWR-10-Q-00023

Notice Type:

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation

Synopsis:

Added: Feb 02, 2010 7:08 pm Modified: Feb 02, 2010 7:50

Quotes are solicited under Request For Quotation (RFQ) number TIRWR-10-Q-00023. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; a written RFQ will not be issued. If your company can provide the product listed in the RFQ and comply with all of the RFQ instructions, please respond to this notice.

This requirement is a Small Business Set-Aside and only qualified sellers may submit quotes. NACIS code for this requirement is 332994. The RFQ opens on the date this announcement is posted and closes Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 2:00:00 PM Pacific Standard Time. Response should be emailed or mailed by the closing date to Marc.Feinberg@irs.gov or IRS, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612. FOB Destination shall be Washington DC.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) intends to purchase sixty Remington Model 870 Police RAMAC #24587 12 gauge pump-action shotguns for the Criminal Investigation Division. The Remington parkerized shotguns, with fourteen inch barrel, modified choke, Wilson Combat Ghost Ring rear sight and XS4 Contour Bead front sight, Knoxx Reduced Recoil Adjustable Stock, and Speedfeed ribbed black forend, are designated as the only shotguns authorized for IRS duty based on compatibility with IRS existing shotgun inventory, certified armorer and combat training and protocol, maintenance, and parts.

Submit quotes including 11% Firearms and Ammunition Excise Tax (FAET) and shipping to Washington DC.

Brady Campaign Bashes Obama

From the Brady Campaign for Criminal Empowerment:

 

http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/press/view/1218/
Ignoring a campaign promise to "repeal the Tiahrt Amendment," the
Obama Administration yesterday maintained, in its proposed budget for
FY 2011, the Bush-era language that requires the destruction of most
Brady background check records, bans the government from requiring
gun dealers to fully account for firearms in their possession, and
prohibits public access to crucial information about crime guns.
The Brady Center highlighted President Obama’s failed leadership on
guns in its recent report card giving the President an "F" on
preventing gun violence in his first year.
To read the report, go to:
http://www.bradycampaign.org/xshare/reports/fedleg/obama-1styear-report.pdf.
Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence,
issued the following statement on the Administration’s failure to
remove the gun lobby language from its budget proposal:
"We are disappointed that President Obama has failed again to propose
repeal of the Tiahrt Amendment as he promised during his
campaign. Keeping this language in place endangers the public by
making it easier for criminals to obtain guns.
"The Tiahrt Amendment undercuts the Brady Law by requiring the
destruction of most Brady background check records in just 24 hours,
allowing guns to remain in the hands of hundreds of criminals whose
gun purchases were mistakenly approved.
"The Tiahrt Amendment also prevents the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF) from requiring that gun dealers conduct
annual inventories - a standard practice for any business- to ensure
they are keeping track of the guns in their possession. The Brady
Center found recently that more than 30,000 guns went ‘missing’ from
licensed gun dealers in just one year. Gun dealers who ‘lose’ large
numbers of firearms from their inventory are often supplying illegal
guns to criminals. The D.C.-area snipers obtained the assault rifle
they used to kill 10 people from a gun shop that ‘lost’ at least 238
guns, including the snipers’ assault rifle, over a three year period.
"President Obama has also maintained from last year his
Administration’s ban on public disclosure of crime gun trace
information. State and local law enforcement are not allowed to
discuss non-confidential trace data with the public it
serves. Before 2003, trace data was available to researchers, public
officials, the media and the public, allowing for research and
analysis of illegal guns, patterns of gun trafficking, and the role
of gun dealers in supplying the illegal market. Policy makers need
more, not less, information on crime guns and where they come from.
"Congress should get rid of the gun lobby’s language and do what the
Obama-Biden ticket called for during the 2008 campaign when they said
they ‘would repeal the Tiahrt amendment.’"
#
Resources:
President Obama’s promise on the Tiahrt Amendment:
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/urban_policy/index_campaign.php
Brady Center Report Card on Obama Administration’s first year record
on gun violence prevention:
http://www.bradycampaign.org/xshare/reports/fedleg/obama-1styear-report.pdf
###

Counterfeit Leupold Riflescope Warning

Leupold® is issuing a customer alert to purchasers of products, particularly via Internet sales, in regards to bogus Leupold products that are apparently being illegally imported from the People’s Republic of China. These products bear many of the marks and trade dress of current Leupold & Stevens riflescopes making them very hard to distinguish externally from authentic Leupold products.

In recent months, counterfeited Leupold Mark 4® riflescopes have begun to arrive with increasing regularity at the firm’s Beaverton, Oregon, headquarters for service. These products are not manufactured by Leupold and are not covered by the Leupold Full Lifetime Guarantee.

Leupold employs serial number tracking for all its riflescopes, so if a customer finds a scope that is suspect, he or she can simply write down the serial number and call 1-800-LEUPOLD to confirm if it is indeed authentic.

In general, most of the scopes appear to originate from Hong Kong (People’s Republic of China), and have “Leupold Mark 4” laser engraved on the bottom of the turret in a silver etch, while the black ring on the objective is etched in white and does not include the name “Leupold.” An authentic Mark 4 riflescope will always be engraved black on black and have the name “Leupold” engraved on the black ring.

Identifying Marks

FBI Sting at SHOT Show

An executive for Smith & Wesson Holding Corp (SWHC.O) and 21 others have been charged with violating federal bribery laws involving the sale of weapons and protective gear, the U.S. Justice Department said on Tuesday.

The indictments accused the individuals, including Smith & Wesson Vice President for Sales Amaro Goncalves, with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, and conspiracy to commit money laundering involving the sale of items including guns and body armor.

The FCPA prohibits the payment of bribes to foreign officials in order to secure business contracts.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation set up sting operations that ensnared the 22 individuals on charges that they tried to bribe a purported African defense minister to win contracts.

Twenty-one of the men were arrested in Las Vegas, where they were attending the SHOT Show, a large shooting-sports and hunting convention. The 22nd defendant was arrested in Miami….

…Among those charged was the chief executive of Protective Products of America Inc (PPA.TO), R. Patrick Caldwell, who previously worked for the U.S. Secret Service for 27 years and was in charge of the division for the vice president’s protection….

…As part of the FBI sting operation, an unidentified business associate who was a former executive for an arms manufacturer arranged a meeting between the arms sales representatives and undercover FBI agents who posed as representatives of an African country’s minister of defense.

The agents told the sales representatives that in order to win a contract, they had to add a 20 percent "commission" to price quotes, half of which would go to the purported minister of defense and the rest would be split between the others.

In the case of the Smith & Wesson executive, Goncalves gave price quotes for two sales, a small one of 25 guns and a larger one with 1,800 pistols. He gave two price quotes for the transactions, including one that had its price inflated by 20 percent, the Justice Department said.

The two-and-a-half-year-long investigation involved 250 FBI agents, according to Mark Mendelsohn, deputy chief of the Justice Department’s fraud division. In connection with the indictments, 150 agents executed 14 search warrants across the country and British police executed another seven, Justice Department officials said.

Three of the defendants worked for unnamed British companies; another worked for an unnamed Israeli company, according to the indictments. The defendants sought to obtain contracts for the sale of products ranging from grenade and tear gas launchers to pistols, ammunition and explosive detection kits….

Source: Reuters

 

I have always objected to this “sting” business. If law enforcement entices a person into doing something or conspiring to do something where otherwise there is no violation of the law, is this really a crime? Should not law enforcement be held equally culpable as part of the conspiracy? Especially in a case like this, where the violation is highly technical and the targets of the sting might not even realize they were in violation, I don’t think this is a legitimate method of law enforcement. Maybe it could be rationalized to capture a known terrorist or high level drug trafficker, but this case stinks.

.380 Pistols and Reliability

From the KTOG list:

When I posted earlier that I carry a small snubby most of the time for SD, I received a reply or two questioning why I would carry a wheel gun when it is somewhat larger than a small semi-auto and carries less rounds and is slower to reload.

American Rifleman recently published a report on nine .380 semi-autos, all but one, the Rohrbaugh R380 @ $1150 MSRP, had malfunctions during testing, from a few to many malfunctions and the text on individual guns indicated that some were ammo sensitive. I realize that these guns were not broken in yet. I do think the tests indicate a tendency to unreliability. I doubt if there was a test of .38 spl snubbies that were not broken in,  there would be very many malfunctions or ammo sensitivity.

You may find the report interesting. It’s at http://tinyurl.com/yhv79sp

Be sure to follow the link to the second page with the photos and text concerning the individual guns.

Alan

Editor’s note: This is one of the many reasons I prefer the revolver.

California Ammo Bill Becomes Law

Can you say, “black market” boys and girls? I thought you could…

Before the midnight deadline Gov. Schwarzenegger acted on 685 bills that were on his desk. He signed 456 and vetoed 229.

One of the bills that he signed was Assembly Bill 962. It requires handgun ammunition to be kept behind the counter where customers cannot access it without assistance. It also requires gun shop owners to thumbprint people who buy handgun ammunition, as well as record their identification and provide that information to police.

Schwarzenegger released a statement explaining why he signed this bill.

"To the Members of the California State Assembly: I am signing Assembly Bill 962.

This measure would require vendors of handgun ammunition to keep a log of information on handgun ammunition sales, store ammunition in a safe and secure manner, and require the face to-face transfer of ammunition sales.

Although I have previously vetoed legislation similar to this measure, local governments have demonstrated that requiring ammunition vendors to keep records on ammunition sales improves public safety. These records have allowed law enforcement to arrest and prosecute persons who have no business possessing firearms and ammunition: gang members, violent parolees, second and third strikers, and even people previously serving time in state prison for murder.

Utilized properly, this type of information is invaluable for keeping communities safe and preventing dangerous felons from committing crimes with firearms.

Moreover, this type of record keeping is no more intrusive for law abiding citizens than similar laws governing pawnshops or the sale of cold medicine. Unfortunately, even the most successful
local program is flawed; without a statewide law, felons can easily skirt the record keeping requirements of one city by visiting another. Assembly Bill 962 will fix this problem by mandating that all ammunition vendors in the state keep records on ammunition sales.

As Governor, I have sought the appropriate balance between public safety and the right to keep and bear arms. I have signed important public safety measures to regulate the sale and transfer of .50 caliber rifles, instituted the California Firearms License Check program, and promoted the use of microstamping technology in handguns. I have also vetoed many pieces of legislation that sought to place unreasonable restrictions and burdens on firearms dealers and ammunition vendors.

Assembly Bill 962 reasonably regulates access to ammunition and improves public safety without placing undue burdens on consumers. For these reasons, I am pleased to sign this bill."

Source: News10/KXTV

The statement says, “Utilized properly, this type of information is invaluable for keeping communities safe and preventing dangerous felons from committing crimes with firearms." I sure would like to see some proof of that. Like your local serial killers and gangbangers are going down to Wal-Mart and getting thumb-printed before they buy their cases of 9mm? Do they buy their cocaine and meth at Walgreens? Give me a break.

Minister who held gun rally at church leaves to promote firearm rights

Ken Pagano, who drew world attention to his small Valley Station church by hosting a rally celebrating God and guns in June, has resigned from his ministry to promote gun rights and church security.

He’s working part-time at a local gun range and has helped form a group called the International Security Coalition of Clergy, along with a New York rabbi and others who are promoting the use of armed and trained security at houses of worship.

Pagano said that although New Bethel Church in Valley Station supported his organizing of the “Open Carry Celebration,” he felt he had become “maybe a little too much of a liability” and brought notoriety to the small congregation.

“I didn’t intend for it to turn out that way, but it did,” said Pagano, 49, a retired Marine who had been pastor of the congregation for a decade. “If we had just had a celebration service and it died down, it might not have been as big a deal. But it still generated quite a bit of interest, which wasn’t bad for me, but as a pastor I was concerned about the congregation.” …

…Pagano organized the Open Carry Celebration at his church on June 27, where participants were encouraged to wear unloaded guns on their holsters. The approximately 200 attendees — church members and visitors that included several members of a private militia — recited patriotic songs and the Pledge of Allegiance and watched a series of Internet videos arguing for the right to bear arms and arguing that gun bans put people at risk.

Source: Courier-Journal

This is huge, maybe bigger than Heller in some ways:

The Supreme Court says it is now prepared to resolve an issue about gun ownership it left unanswered when it made its historic 2008 ruling striking down the District of Columbia’s strict handgun law.

The justices announced Wednesday they will hear an Illinois case asking if their ruling last year in District of Columbia v. Heller extends to the states.

The lawsuit the justices agreed to hear was originally filed within hours after the high court’s ruling that overturned a ban on possessing handguns in the nation’s capital. Chicago and Oak Park, Ill. have similar bans that are now being challenged.

The case is led by the lawyer who successfully argued Heller before the high court last year and is sure to become the focus of all interests in the gun debate but the legal question that is now before the Court is a bit more mundane.

Incorporation is the technical word for making a Constitutional Amendment applicable to the states. When the Bill of Rights was passed, the Founders specifically rejected a proposal to incorporate the Amendments. Instead, the laws were only applicable to the federal government.

But starting in 1897, the high court has undergone a piecemeal process of incorporating various parts of the Bill of Rights. Today’s cases are asking the justices to extend the federally protected Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms to the states. Something has yet to do.

Last year, in a 5-4 decision, the high court ruled that individuals do have a Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. But Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion specifically avoided the question of whether or not that ruling extends to the states. Since then, lower courts have divided on the matter.

In the Illinois case, the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled against the gun advocates saying that there was no high court precedent allowing it to apply the Second Amendment to the states.

The Court isn’t expected to hear arguments in the case until next year.

Source: Fox News

Remembering Eight Years and Beyond

Sometimes it seems that life is just a process of losing things: innocence, youth, dreams, health, time and life itself. One might wax mystical about it and say that it is the way we achieve freedom from all that binds us to this temporary existence. It sounds good on paper, but it’s a drag when it’s happening.

Days tick by like minutes. They say that old men spend their time looking back. I’m getting older, and I don’t want to slip into that trap, but it’s hard sometimes to stay out of the past, to forget the rush of time and stay focused on what yet needs to be done.

A friend sent me a picture of her daughter who is starting the fourth grade this year. As I looked at the child’s picture, it occurred to me that, in the year I was in the fourth grade, John F. Kennedy was assassinated. Whoa. Talk about “seeing your life flash before your eyes.”

Today we remember another day as traumatic as the Kennedy Assassination, the 9-11 attack. Eight years ago, 19 religious fanatics hijacked commercial airliners and crashed them into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and into a field in Pennsylvania. I can’t add much to what has already been said about the searing wound this act did to the national psyche. I suppose we will commemorate it for the next fifty years or so, until the memory slowly fades from the collective psyche, in the same way the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941 is fading today.

The 9-11 attack essentially destroyed the Bush presidency. The administration was quick to declare the attack to be “an act of war” and to define itself as a “wartime presidency.” I believe that this was a profound error. In my opinion, the 9-11 attack was a crime perpetrated by a group of suicidal lunatics. When an event is determined to be “an act of war” there are legal implications to such a definition. Civil rights are handled differently during wartime than in peacetime. The president has certain powers during wartime that are not available to peacetime presidents. These include the authority to commit the armed forces to battle and the suspension of habeas corpus. The Bush administration was too quick to seize the opportunity and use 9-11 as the raison d’être to settle old scores in Iraq. It would prove to be their undoing. It resulted in the most unpopular presidency since Reconstruction.

Today, Al Qaeda is a shattered band of renegades scurrying around the tribal areas of Pakistan; Saddam is dead; the Bush presidency is just a bad memory; Barak Hussein Obama is president of the United States, but the trauma of 9-11 remains. Troops are still deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan and we’re still arguing about it. There is still just a big hole where the World Trade Center used to be. We still prattle about “the war on terror.” Has anything been learned, or are we pretty much where we started out, but with a Texas-sized grudge toward all things Islamic?

One thing we obviously haven’t learned is that you cannot wage war against an idea. You can only wage war against people and their governments. You can’t shoot an idea or carpet bomb a concept. It just doesn’t work. We also haven’t seemed to learn that you don’t make friends with people by shooting at them. These things seem like no-brainers to me, but some folks still don’t get it.

I hope we have learned that we can never allow the United States to be governed by fear. Also, I hope we have learned that not all Islamic people share the same ideology with the Al Qaeda nut cases. We’ll see. I’m not at all sure.

A moment of silence for all of those who died in the attack and the wars that followed.

A moment of somber reflection on how stupid we can be.

A moment of hope that good will ultimately triumph over evil, and that maybe, through it all, we will come through it wiser, steadier, and maybe even better.

- Next »