Front Sight, Press

The Myth of 90 Percent: Only a Small Fraction of Guns in Mexico Come From U.S.

While 90 percent of the guns traced to the U.S. actually originated in the United States, the percent traced to the U.S. is only about 17 percent of the total number of guns reaching Mexico.

By William La Jeunesse and Maxim Lott on FOXNews.com

You’ve heard this shocking "fact" before — on TV and radio, in newspapers, on the Internet and from the highest politicians in the land: 90 percent of the weapons used to commit crimes in Mexico come from the United States.

• Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said it to reporters on a flight to Mexico City.
• CBS newsman Bob Schieffer referred to it while interviewing President Obama.
• California Sen. Dianne Feinstein said at a Senate hearing: "It is unacceptable to have 90 percent of the guns that are picked up in Mexico and used to shoot judges, police officers and mayors … come from the United States."
• William Hoover, assistant director for field operations at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, testified in the House of Representatives that "there is more than enough evidence to indicate that over 90 percent of the firearms that have either been recovered in, or interdicted in transport to Mexico, originated from various sources within the United States."

There’s just one problem with the 90 percent "statistic" and it’s a big one: It’s just not true.

In fact, it’s not even close. By all accounts, it’s probably around 17 percent.

What’s true, an ATF spokeswoman told FOXNews.com, in a clarification of the statistic used by her own agency’s assistant director, "is that over 90 percent of the traced firearms originate from the U.S."

But a large percentage of the guns recovered in Mexico do not get sent back to the U.S. for tracing, because it is obvious from their markings that they do not come from the U.S.

"Not every weapon seized in Mexico has a serial number on it that would make it traceable, and the U.S. effort to trace weapons really only extends to weapons that have been in the U.S. market," Matt Allen, special agent of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), told FOX News.

A Look at the Numbers

In 2007-2008, according to ATF Special Agent William Newell, Mexico submitted 11,000 guns to the ATF for tracing. Close to 6,000 were successfully traced — and of those, 90 percent — 5,114 to be exact, according to testimony in Congress by William Hoover — were found to have come from the U.S.

But in those same two years, according to the Mexican government, 29,000 guns were recovered at crime scenes.

In other words, 68 percent of the guns that were recovered were never submitted for tracing. And when you weed out the roughly 6,000 guns that could not be traced from the remaining 32 percent, it means 83 percent of the guns found at crime scenes in Mexico could not be traced to the U.S.

So, if not from the U.S., where do they come from? There are a variety of sources:

• The Black Market. Mexico is a virtual arms bazaar, with fragmentation grenades from South Korea, AK-47s from China, and shoulder-fired rocket launchers from Spain, Israel and former Soviet bloc manufacturers.
• Russian crime organizations. Interpol says Russian Mafia groups such as Poldolskaya and Moscow-based Solntsevskaya are actively trafficking drugs and arms in Mexico.
• South America. During the late 1990s, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) established a clandestine arms smuggling and drug trafficking partnership with the Tijuana cartel, according to the Federal Research Division report from the Library of Congress.
• Asia. According to a 2006 Amnesty International Report, China has provided arms to countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Chinese assault weapons and Korean explosives have been recovered in Mexico.
• The Mexican Army. More than 150,000 soldiers deserted in the last six years, according to Mexican Congressman Robert Badillo. Many took their weapons with them, including the standard issue M-16 assault rifle made in Belgium.
• Guatemala. U.S. intelligence agencies say traffickers move immigrants, stolen cars, guns and drugs, including most of America’s cocaine, along the porous Mexican-Guatemalan border. On March 27, La Hora, a Guatemalan newspaper, reported that police seized 500 grenades and a load of AK-47s on the border. Police say the cache was transported by a Mexican drug cartel operating out of Ixcan, a border town…

Source: Fox News

So, what can be observed from this disinformation campaign?

• The groundwork is being laid for a new American “assault weapon ban.”
• The Mexican drug gang violence complaint is a stalking horse for the gun grabbers in the United States. This is part of the “case building” for the new AWB.
• There is no limit to to dishonesty of the forces of gun control. They simply do not respect the truth. They operate on the theory that if you just say something long and loud enough, it will eventually become “true” in the minds of the media-hypnotized masses.

See also: Obama administration, Congressional anti-gunners mislead public on guns in Mexico

President Barak Obama has applied for an out-of-state concealed carry permit from the state of Florida.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton purchased a full auto AK-47 on her recent trip to Asia.

Attorney General Eric Holder has resigned and admitted that he got everything wrong.

Vice President Joe Biden apologized to the nation for being a jerk.

The entire House Banking committee admitted that they had been on the payroll of AIG for years.

The State of California passed “Vermont-style” concealed carry today.

Wal-Mart announced that they would begin giving away cases of 9mm ammunition because no one was willing to buy it.

Bill Clinton announced on the Larry King show that he is a transvestite and wants to act in an upcoming reprise of The Rocky Horror Picture Show.

Osama Bin Laden turned himself in to the FBI today. It was later revealed that he had been living under an assumed name in Dover, Maryland for a decade.

General Motors made money.

…April Fools

The ‘America Is Arming Mexico’s Drug Gangs’ Lie

by Dan Gifford

“There is an iron river of guns that flows South into Mexico [from the United States] to supply criminal organizations on the border,” says Tom Mangan, senior special agent with Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) in Phoenix. “They are in the market for machine guns, hand grenades, rocket-propelled grenade launchers and Stinger anti-aircraft missiles,” he continues. That’s right. The drug gangs can’t buy that and other military stuff like the 40MM grenades (the silver things in the upper left) and the rifles with launchers shown in the photo below in Mexico, so they drive to the United States and purchase them from American gun dealers at retail. Isn’t that the story you’ve been told?  Well, congratulations. America’s First Amendment protected propaganda ministry has punked you on another important issue — this time on behalf of dissembling officials and gun confiscation advocates.

For the benefit of those who may not know, machine guns (not the same thing as the demonized “semi-automatic”), hand grenades, rocket-propelled grenade launchers, Stinger anti-aircraft missiles and other such military items are illegal to possess by US civilians, which means they are not for sale in gun stores. OK, in the interest of extreme accuracy for anyone in need, there are some civilian owned machine-guns in America, but they all have to have been registered with the ATF by 1986 as evidence that a special Treasury tax has been paid and the owner’s residence state has to approve the possession. What’s more, none of these arms has ever been involved in a crime, to my knowledge, and all are considered very pricey collectors items. That means they are not for sale to or in the hands of Mexican drug goons.

That raises some questions:

If Mexican gangsters are not buying military weapons in the United States, why do people like ATF officials, Attorney General Holder, Secretary of State Clinton, gun prohibitionists like Sarah Brady and multitudes of media talking heads claim they are while calling for an American “assault weapon” ban they say will to keep the Mexican drug gangs from buying what they really aren’t buying here because they can’t? …

Read the Whole Thing Here

h/t to David Hardy at Arms and the Law

As gun shoppers are discovering, it’s becoming easier to buy a gun than ammunition

As a growing number of gun shoppers are discovering these days, it’s becoming easier to buy a gun than it is to purchase the ammunition for it. Shortages of popular handgun calibers in particular have dealers and customers fuming, and ammo makers have shifted their production lines into overdrive to keep up with the demand. How long will the "bullet bubble" last? That depends in large part on politics in Washington and in statehouses across the land, and the messages that various legislative efforts convey.

Concerns over what the election of Barack Obama portends for gun owners is the main cause for the inflated demand for ammunition. In fact, since last November’s election ammunition has been flying off store shelves faster than you can say "microstamping," with sales increases topping 100 percent in many areas. Gun sales ramped up by 42 percent last November, but have cooled off slightly since. From Election Day to now, the monthly sales average for firearms has been about 29 percent higher than normal. February sales tailed off a bit, to slightly more than 23 percent over average, according to sales figures compiled by the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF)…

…"A lot of my guys think that the government is going to tax ammo to the point that it gets ungodly expensive," says Rausher. "So they’re buying ammo and putting it away — 9mm, .380, .38 Special, .40 S&W, .45 — all the popular stuff. I think they’re probably on the right track. Something is coming; something is going to happen. Whether it’s microstamping or non-lead bullets, ammo is going up in cost." Source: ESPN

Of course, my family jokes about my stash of ammo. I have cartridges for guns I don’t even own, so I’m no one to talk, but I will anyway. What good does it do to stockpile a gazillion rounds of ammo for guns that are outlawed? What am I going to do with my 3000 rounds of 7.62×39mm when the guns that fire them suddenly become contraband?

Buy ammo and components before the prices go up? Come on; this is just back door gun control. I can guarantee you that you will run out of money before the Congress runs out of new taxes. And also, if they can push through a punitive ammo tax, they won’t stop there. They will feel emboldened to ban classes of ammunition and the guns that fire them.

Rather than buying a boxcar of ammo that may instantly become worthless tomorrow, wouldn’t it be better to get involved with the struggle for gun rights, and send some money and letters to your favorite gun rights organizations and favorite legislators. The ammo that we really need right now is political muscle.

Pinelake Health and Rehab: More killings in ‘gun free’ zones

On Sunday morning, gunman Robert Stewart barged into Pinelake Health and Rehab in Carthage, North Carolina, and killed seven patients and a nurse, wounding three others. As in previous massacres, the killer picked a so-called “gun free” zone where firearms are officially prohibited. According to an employee of Peak Resources Incorporated, which operates Pinelake and five other health care facilities, all of their facilities are posted against concealed weapons.

Read the whole thing here

I feel compelled to add at this point, that as sympathetic as I am to the point of view expressed above, these crazy shootings are a disaster for our gun rights. I can’t really see a day when workers at nursing homes, day cares, and schools will be armed to the teeth and adequately trained to repel an attack such as this. Consequently, each of these crazy shootings provides ammunition to the gun grabbers and strengthens the political of will of a growing number of Americans who are tired of having their “safe places” turned into shooting galleries. We know that there aren’t any real safe places, but that crystalline logic is not enough to dissuade those who feel a need to “do something” to make their world “safer.” They will do something, even if it’s wrong.

As gun owners, we need to do more than just rely on the old clichés: “See, if everyone had a gun, this wouldn’t have happened,” or “Nobody ever shoots up a gun shop.” When we do this, we are “preaching to the choir” but no one else is listening. I don’t pretend to know the answer, but I do know that our easy answers, as logical as they may be, are wearing thin on a lot of folks.

This is just so typical:

"Our inability to prevent weapons from being illegally smuggled across the border to arm these criminals causes the deaths of police officers, soldiers and civilians. So, yes, I feel very strongly we have a co-responsibility."…

…The United States needs to stop the flow of guns, body armor and night-vision goggles to the cartels, Clinton said.

"These criminals are outgunning the law enforcement officials," she said.

"When you go into a gunfight or are trying to round up these bad guys and they have military-style equipment that is much better than yours, you start out at a disadvantage. Since we know the vast majority of that comes from our country, we are going to help stop it from getting there in the first place." Source: CNN

So our newly-minted Secretary of mis-STATE-ment has decreed that it isn’t the murderous Mexican drug gangs who are responsible for the butchering of hundreds of their own people; it’s America. We’re at fault. How utterly stereotypical. What classic liberal “blame America first” double-speak. The Hildabeast is becoming a Doonesbury caricature.

And how do you think she is going to “stop it from getting there in the first place”? (As if America is the only or even the best place to buy an AK)? Can you say, “Assault Weapons Ban,” boys and girls? I thought you could.

You lose yourself, you reappear
You suddenly find you got nothing to fear
Alone you stand with nobody near
When a trembling distant voice, unclear
Startles your sleeping ears to hear
That somebody thinks
They really found you.

A question in your nerves is lit
Yet you know there is no answer fit to satisfy
Insure you not to quit
To keep it in your mind and not fergit
That it is not he or she or them or it
That you belong to.

- Bob Dylan

I’m not adjusting to this new reality very well. Obamaworld is a strange place indeed. I feel disoriented and disappointed. I’m not really sure what to say or which way to go. That’s the reason I haven’t had much to say lately.

You see, I’m angry. Of course I’m angry at what the Obamatrons threaten to do to our civil rights, but I’m angry too at the Bush Republicans. They screwed up by the numbers, starting with the mistaken justification of the war in Iraq, and on to the perversely named “Patriot Act,” the Department of Homeland Insecurity that probably has me classified as a dangerous subversive by now, the botched rebuilding of Iraq, the failure to capture Bin Laden, the mismanagement of the financial system… the list just goes on and on. The failures of the Bush administration and its congressional rubber-stamp leadership have put us in this position. The people were so angry by the time the election came around that I think the Democrats could have run Brittany Spears for president and won. I’m angry. I’m angry at just about everyone.

I have spent the past twenty five years working for the cause of gun rights. Now, I’m faced with the specter of watching everything that we have worked for turned back and dismantled by the newly empowered nanny-staters.  It’s infuriating.

This was an ominous portent:

In Thursday’s ruling, Federal District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued the preliminary injunction against the Department of the Interior rule that took effect on January 9, 2009. The revised rule allowed individuals to carry concealed firearms for self-defense in national parks and national wildlife refuges located in states that allow the carrying of concealed firearms.

I’m sure this is just the first of a long series of setbacks we will face. A new “assault weapons ban” is already in the works and it will be a whole lot worse than the last one. Our new attorney general was the Clinton administration’s point man on gun control and I expect plenty of fun and games out of him – you know, the guy who accused us of being a nation of racial cowards right after we elected the first African-American president. That same jerk, Eric Holder, is also in charge of the ATF. I can hardly wait.

So, I’m considering my options:

1. Denial: Pretend that John McCain won the election.
   My sense of reality is a bit too strong for this one.
2. Insurrection: Form a militia unit and die in a hail of gunfire in a few weeks.
   Doesn’t really sound like a whole lot of fun.
3. Convert to Socialism: Have a red star tattooed on my butt.
   Not really my style.
4. Keep on Keeping On:
   The only real choice.

There’s another thing that makes me crazy: just when I get my motivation together to rejoin the fight, some “failed personality” kills ten innocent people in Alabama, or a preacher in Illinois, or four cops in Oakland. Every time one of these incidents happen, our job gets more difficult. For those of us who support armed self defense, these events simply confirm the need for us to be armed. Yet, for a growing number of people, a simple if flawed logic prevails: if they didn’t have the guns, they couldn’t do these things. I sense that the political will is growing to put in place far more stringent forms of gun control in response to these incidents. The National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Gun Control Act of 1968 were political responses to high-profile gun mayhem. It can happen again.

In my town, it seems that almost every night there is another killing. Most of these crimes are done with illegal guns, and most of the perps and victims are young African Americans. This scenario plays out daily in all of our urban centers. The carnage is senseless, tragic and happening on a large scale. Two days ago, a young black woman was gunned down in broad daylight in a city park with lots of people around her. Was she a crack dealer or gangster? No, under pressure from a judge, she had agreed to testify in a murder trial about another shooting she had witnessed last year.  People are getting tired of this kind of thing and it’s happening way too often. It may not be right, and it may violate the Constitution, but if people get frightened enough, they can do some wrong and irrational things.

I haven’t changed my stance on anything, and I certainly haven’t sold my rifle, but I will confess that I have grown tired of defending “assault weapons” in the face of these horrendous crimes. With each successive horror, the constitutional argument seems weaker, and I fear that the day will come that people will stop listening to it altogether. Actually, that day may have already arrived. I believe that the only thing which stays the hand of the new administration is that the financial crisis is far more urgent. The new administration must succeed in turning the economy around or its credibility is down the toilet. They know they cannot afford a gun control fight right now. That’s the only thing standing between us and a gun control act of 2009, the likes of which we would have not thought possible only a few short years ago.

So, that’s what I dealing with, thinking about and struggling with. That’s why I have been so quiet of late (and also, I’m susceptible to burn-out). Where to go, what tone to take, what picture of the future should be guiding me – these are the questions which bring me to the word processor but leave me staring at a blank page. I hope I’ll achieve some clarity, but I can’t say it has happened yet.

Darkness at the break of noon
Shadows even the silver spoon
The handmade blade, the child’s balloon
Eclipses both the sun and moon
To understand you know too soon
There is no sense in trying.

Pointed threats, they bluff with scorn
Suicide remarks are torn
From the fool’s gold mouthpiece
The hollow horn plays wasted words
Proves to warn
That he not busy being born
Is busy dying.

An afternoon shootout at a busy Burger King restaurant in Miami left a potential robber dead and the customer who shot him seriously wounded.

The bloody event unfolded about 4 p.m. Tuesday at the restaurant at Northeast 54th Street and Biscayne Boulevard. It was a time, employees said, when it is usually crowded with schoolchildren and people getting out of work early.

The robber entered wearing a ski mask. He approached a clerk, showed his gun and demanded money, said Miami police spokesman Jeff Giordano.

A customer eyed him and the two started arguing. The customer had a concealed-weapons permit and his gun — and the two exchanged gunfire.

The robber crumpled to the floor and was pronounced dead at the scene.

The customer, with several gunshot wounds, was in serious but stable condition at Jackson Memorial Hospital’s Ryder Trauma Center. Source: Miami Herald

At the risk of a charge of armchair quarter backing, I want to make some observations on this one. I have serious objections to receiving gunshot wounds. They hurt a lot. They heal very slowly and often incompletely. And, they may be fatal.

Since I was not on the scene at the time of this incident, I can’t form any opinions about the appropriateness of the defender’s actions. They only thing I can say for sure is that this is not the way we want things to turn out. “Job One is to go home with no bullet holes,” as Jim is fond of saying.

“Would’a, Could’a and Should’a” are really popular games to play, and perhaps if we had the police report we could do that with some accuracy. As it is, what we can glean from this incident is that this is the reason we practice tactics like lateral movement, “moving off the X” and explosive presentation.

By Gabe Suarez

How many of you carry wheelguns?

Jeff Cooper once told me that, in the old days of training, half of a typical pistol class would be comprised of auto-loading handguns - Typically Browning/Colt types. The other half, usually police officers, would be armed with revolvers. He said that this trend slowly began to change in the early eighties. By the time I attended his courses in the late eighties, it was rare to see a revolver-armed student.

This trend was also seen in law enforcement. I went through my original Police Academy pistol training, back in the old days, with a revolver (S&W Model 67). The most common sidearm for many officers, at that time, was some sort of Smith & Wesson or Colt revolver, usually .38 Special or .357 Magnum. Today, however, you rarely see revolvers in the field, and then only in the holsters of older officers, usually just months from retirement. Most of the newer breed sport Glocks, Berettas, and other ultra-modern handguns. The feeling among many officers is that the "wheelgun" is obsolete. For many, its only true role is that of last-ditch backup in the form of a 2" Barreled .38 snubbie. Is the revolver obsolete? Let’s think about this.

While, I am one of those who favors a modern handgun (Glock in my case), I am not so quick to dismiss a good revolver. The revolver is very effective as a fighting tool. All you need do to verify that is study your history. A fighting handgun, regardless of design, is intended for a specific mission. That mission, specifically, is to allow its operator to respond to unanticipated threats, quickly and in a powerful manner. That mission is the same today, as it was 50 years ago. These confrontations have always been characterized by high intensity, short duration violence, where so-called firepower is rarely an issue. Of greater importance is the ability to deal the adversary a solid and powerful blow, before he does the same to you. Most revolvers designed for anti-personnel use fulfill that mission as well as any other handgun, but no handgun is powerful enough to come with a 100% guarantee. Sometimes a follow-up shot…or two is needed. So controllability becomes an issue.

Many fighting revolvers are of the .38/.357 caliber family. This will do fine as long as careful ammunition selection takes place. Some .357 magnum loads, for example, are dramatically over-penetrative and exhibit excessive muzzle flash. Other loads, which are just as effective against humans, do not share the same characteristics of penetration and muzzle flash.

Revolvers are also available in .40/.44 caliber. In my opinion, although larger than their 357 caliber cousins, provide a greater potential of creating damage to the adversary. Be careful with load selection again. It is a rare individual who can control a full-house .44 magnum in hammers and multiple target engagements. Don’t trust your life to "magic bullet" propaganda. A thorough study of the literature available from forensic specialists on wound trauma, and terminal ballistics should be your guide.

While on the issue of weapon control, mention must be made of the grips on a revolver (Yeah, I know.  Cooper used to call them "stocks".  I don’t care.  To me stocks belong on a rifle). Many of the wooden grips originally sold on revolvers were there as almost an after thought. This has changed in recent years as revolver manufacturers attempt to regain a share of the market. These weapons are now being sold with more suitable grips from the factory. Whether you retain the factory standard or purchase some type of after-market grips, be certain that the left-side panel allows clearance for speed-loader insertion and manipulation. If this is not the case, either change them, or modify them.
Additionally, any sharp edges or points on a weapon intended for combative use are to be avoided. Briskly rub your hands all over the revolver. Anyplace you find a sharp edge, remove it. Do this even if refinishing the weapon is needed as a result. This is not an issue with the stainless steel revolvers, but it may with a blue steel weapon.

Skill requires practice, both dry and live-fire. This is something you’ll probably avoid if your gun tears up your hands so much that you need to keep some bandages and plasma around when you practice.

Along with control, accuracy is of great importance. The two things on a revolver affecting this the most, assuming that everything is in working order, are the sights and the trigger. Revolver sights come in adjustable and fixed varieties. Either one is acceptable, as long as they are easy to see quickly under stress, and in dim light. Avoid any sights that are extremely high profile, or which have sharp edges. Again, sharp, hand-slashing points may be rounded off with a file. For those who operate in low light environments, tritium sights are available for many revolvers.

The actual trigger on most revolvers is suitable as issued. It should not be excessively wide, nor should it have grooves or other additions on its face. Smooth and polished is the best type of trigger face. Remember, most combat revolver shooting will be done in double action, so a trigger that allows easy double action work is preferred. There is little that the individual can do in order to alter the actual weight of the trigger press. This is the realm of the revolver-gunsmith. Whatever you do, do not cut the springs on your revolver. If you wish a lighter, smoother trigger, you can have one, but there are no shortcuts here.

Revolvers are issued with all sorts of barrel lengths. Again, keep sight of the mission. These weapons will be carried in and presented from a holster. A very long barrel will be slow and difficult to maneuver. Similarly detrimental, an extremely short barrel will sacrifice other mission requirements. A good compromise is something in the 4 inch to 6 inch range. If concealment is the paramount concern, I don’t think the adversary at three feet will care what length the barrel is so go for a 3 inch or 2 inch version.

Those are all the requirements of a fighting revolver. I have found that when compared to the auto-loading pistols, unless the test is slanted toward the auto-loader, the revolver is just as useful. With proper ammunition, the revolver gives away nothing to the auto-loader in terms of terminal ballistics. The only area where it is surpassed by the auto-loader is when long strings of fire are faced, which may be a requirement in the fight.

The revolver skills that an operator must have to be effective are the same ones he would need if equipped with an auto-loader. Constant attention must be given to double action trigger manipulation. This is the heart of the wheelgun, so dry practice the DA trigger day and night. Along with this, manipulating Speed Loaders is of great importance, as is developing ability to maneuver individual rounds during tactical reloads. This is the only weakness of the revolver, so make allowance for that. In order to be the best you can be with the revolver, it is essential to seek out and obtain professional instruction.

Is the revolver dead? In a word, no. I suspect that as we move deeper into the 21st century, however, we will see few revolvers in holsters as "primary weapons". For those who are required to carry it, or for those who favor its simplicity, the revolver will still allow them to do just as well in a confrontation as long as the operator does his part. As we’ve always said, It is the man, and not the weapon which makes the difference. 

Gabe Suarez
One Source Tactical
Suarez International USA
Christian Warrior Ministries

Wild Angels by Martina McBride

Written By Gary Harrison/Harry Stinson

Between the perfect world and the bottom line
Keeping love alive in these troubled times
It’s a miracle in itself
And we know too well what that’s about
Still we made it through, only God knows how
We must’ve had a little help

(Must’ve been)
Wild Angels, Wild Angels
Watching over you and me
Wild Angels, Wild Angels
Baby what else could it be

Well it must’ve been hard, it must’ve been tough
Keeping up with crazy fools like us
‘Cause it’s so easy to fall apart
And we still break each other’s heart sometimes
Spent some nights on the jagged side
Somehow we wake up in each other’s arms

(Must’ve been)
Wild Angels, Wild Angels
Watching over you and me
Wild Angels, Wild Angels
Baby what else could it be

There are some nights
I watch you while you dream
I swear I hear the sound of beating wings

Wild Angels, Wild Angels
Watching over you and me
Wild Angels, Wild Angels
Baby what else could it be